Showing posts with label Equal parenting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Equal parenting. Show all posts

Monday, June 25, 2012

Belgians favor shared parenting by majority (69,5%)

A majority of Belgians (69,5%) advocates joint physical care and alternating residence of the children as the best parenting arrangement after divorce
Belgium - Le Soir - Page 1 – Translation from French by P. Tromp - Monday, June 25, 2012

According to a Belgian public opinion survey by the Francophone magazine Filiatio, seven out of ten Belgians are in favor of equal accommodation or bilocation of the child between the homes of divorced parents. This type of care is far preferred above sole care arrangements for the children with one of the parents, combined with a “fortnightly weekend of access with the other parent " (15.2%) or the "5/9" – parenting arrangement with the children staying five days of every fortnight with one of the parents, and nine days of every fortnight with the other parent ( 5.2%).

A clear difference was observed between the two main Belgian language communities: with joint physical care, residence and custody being more popular with the Flemish (81.2%) than with the Francophones (54.5%). "The socio-economic factor must play a role”, analyses Prof. Yves-Henri Leleu, a specialist in family law at the University of Liège (ULg). “Accommodation costs of shared egalitarian accommodation or bilocation of the children with both parents obviously is more expensive: it takes two homes, two cars, etc.. Also the "northern countries" are more emancipated. Finally, there is certainly more family support services made available (crèches, nurseries ...) on the Flemish side. "

Divorce: joint physical custody is popular in Belgium
Belgium - Le Soir - DORZEE, HUGHES - Page 7 – Translation from French by P. Tromp - Monday, June 25, 2012

Families - A survey by « Filiatio » confirms the attractiveness for equally shared physical custody and care and alternating residence

When a couple separates who should take care of the children: mom, dad, or both? In Belgium the vast majority of the public is in favor of bilocation or "equally shared physical care and alternating residence" over the children after divorce.

According to a survey conducted by AEGIS / Deep Blue, on behalf of the magazine Filiatio (1), nearly seven out of ten respondents (69, 5%) favor an egalitarian accommodation of the children with both their parents after divorce.

This type of care is far preferred above sole care arrangements for the children with one of the parents, combined with a “fortnightly weekend of access with the other parent " (15.2%) or the "5/9" – parenting arrangement with the children staying five days a fortnight with one of the parents, and nine days a fortnight with the other parent (5.2%).

However, there is a clear difference between the Dutch north (Flanders) and the Francophone south (Wallonia) of Belgium: this mode of "custody" is praised more by the Flemish (81.2%) than by the Francophones (54.5%). The reasons? "The socio-economic factor must play a role”, analyses Prof. Yves-Henri Leleu, a specialist in family law at the University of Liège (ULg). “Accommodation costs of shared egalitarian accommodation or bilocation of the children with both parents obviously is more expensive: it takes two homes, two cars, etc.. Also the "northern countries" are more emancipated. Finally, there is certainly more family support services made available (crèches, nurseries ...) on the Flemish side. "

A view shared by the authors of the survey: "There is also greater professional support in family law in Flanders. And, conversely, greater resistance on the French side, "says Céline Lefevre from the magazine Filiatio.

"Avoiding Conflicts"
Either way, the results of this survey are surprising. They confirm the evolution of mentalities in Belgium and abroad (France, Spain, Italy ...). This evolution results from a new legislative framework - the Belgian Bilocation Act of September 14, 2006 – in which judges are encouraged to review egalitarian care, residence and housing of the children with both parents with "priority". Unless it is "manifestly contrary to the interests of the child."

 In order to decide, the judge takes into account different criteria (geographical distance, "the serious unavailability" of a parent, the age of the child, expressed non-interest in caring for the children or neglect of the children ...). "The law does not require or prescribe a generalization of the bilocation formula, but focuses on advocating an agreement and avoiding disputes. If neither of the parents approves for joint physical custody, the judge will not impose it automatically,"says Professor Leleu.

But the trend is there: the "equally shared care and residence" has gradually become accepted and entering the customs. While it has both its advantages (maintaining bonds with both parents equally; giving free time to both parents ...) and its disadvantages (instability and displacement, an obligation to "double" necessary accommodation facilities ...), as is shown in a study by the University of Liège (Casman, 2010).

 In addition, 'part time' parents also seem to have a typical profile: 30-40 years, higher educated, steady jobs with employers, having flexible working schedules, etc.

And in practice?
We do not have data to assess objectively the part of court decisions in favor of this type of care.  

"In general”, Céline Lefevre adds, ”it seems that the egalitarian accommodation or bilocation is under-represented in court decisions. So there would be a discrepancy between what Belgian people think and what is applied by judges."

"Each case is specific”, tempers Professor Leleu. “This type of accommodation is not applicable all the time. In some cases, it is counter-indicated (geographical distance from parents, tensions between the parents ...). In addition, it requires a lot of dialogue between the former spouses (medical follow-up, sports activities ...) "

The survey Filiatio has conducted also considered other aspects of family life (child report, the role of law, court delays ...), including mediation. Again the conclusion is clear: more than six out of ten Belgians (64%) are in favor of "imposing obligatory mediation to separating parents."

(1) This survey was conducted by telephone in March 2012 based on a representative sample of 500 people aged 18-70 years with a margin of error of 4.4%. (www.filiatio.be)

69.5%
This is the percentage of Belgians in favor of "equally shared physical care and residence". With strong differences between the Flemish (81.2%) and the French (54.5%) communities in Belgium.

Original articles in French:

Wednesday, July 01, 2009

Résidence alternée en France en 2007

La décision sur la résidence des enfants en France en 2007
Source: Le Divorce; Ministère de la Justice, République Francaise, Laure Chaussebourg, Valérie Carrasco, Aurélie Lermenier, SG-2S2M- SDSE – BDSE, pp. 21-23, Juin 2009

Globalement, en 2007, plus de trois quarts des enfants mineurs dont les parents divorcent vont résider chez leur mère, 8 % chez leur père et 15 % en alternance chez l’un et l’autre de leurs parents –tableau 3-. Plus le divorce est contentieux, moins la résidence alternée est fréquente. Sa part passe ainsi de 21,5 % pour le consentement mutuel à 11 % pour le divorce accepté et n’est plus que de 4 % dans les divorces pour faute. De plus, parmi les cas où la résidence est fixée exclusivement chez l’un des parents, plus le divorce est contentieux, plus la part de la résidence chez le père est importante par rapport à celle de la résidence chez la mère : ainsi la répartition entre une résidence chez le père et chez la mère est de 8 % - 92 % en cas de consentement mutuel, 10 % - 90 % en cas de divorce accepté et 12 % - 88 % en cas de divorce pour faute.

La taille de la fratrie influe peu sur le choix de la résidence, mais que quel que soit le type de divorce (par consentement mutuel, divorce accepté ou pour faute), la résidence alternée est toujours un peu plus fréquente pour les fratries de 2 enfants mineurs, et un peu moins pour celles d’au moins 3 enfants mineurs.


L’âge de l’enfant est par contre déterminant concernant le choix de la résidence –graphique 7 & 8-. A tout âge, la résidence chez la mère est largement majoritaire, mais sa part diminue quand l’âge de l’enfant augmente et passe de 94 % pour les enfants de moins d’un an à 74 % pour ceux de 17 ans. Inversement, la part de la résidence chez le père augmente avec l’âge et passe de 1 % pour les moins d’un an à 16 % pour les enfants de 17 ans. Quant à la résidence alternée, sa part augmente régulièrement de 0 à 9 ans, passant de 5 % à 18 %, puis diminue de 10 à 17 ans, pour se retrouver à 9 %.



Quand la résidence est fixée chez le père ou en alternance, la situation la plus fréquente est l’absence de contribution –tableau 4-. Tous divorces confondus, il n'y a aucune contribution à l'entretien pour les trois quarts des enfants résidant chez leur père et 77 % de ceux qui résident en alternance. Quand une contribution est versée pour des enfants résidant en alternance, c'est pratiquement toujours par le père, cette situation étant plus fréquente en cas de divorce pour faute (37 %) que dans les divorces acceptés (27 %) ou les divorces par consentement mutuel (21 %).

En revanche, quand l’enfant réside chez sa mère, le père verse une contribution à l'entretien pour 84 % des enfants. Dans les consentements mutuels, les pères versent une contribution pour 87 % des enfants qui résident chez leur mère contre 74 % des pères qui ont divorcé par un "autre type de divorce" (un divorce fondé sur la séparation des époux le plus souvent).